Fractional-dose inactivated poliovirus vaccine, India.

In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced a global shortage of inactivated poliovirus vaccine that was expected to last until 2020 at least. In response, WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization recommended that countries consider a strategic shift to fractional-dose inactivated poliovirus vaccine, which involves a new dosing schedule (i.e. administered at 6 and 14 weeks of age) and has a different mode of delivery than full-dose inactivated poliovirus vaccine (i.e. intradermal rather than intramuscular). Introduction of fractional-dosing requires careful planning and management to ensure adequate vaccine supplies, to prevent wastage, to provide training for health workers, and to ensure accurate record-keeping. In early 2016, given the global vaccine shortage and a limited supply from domestic manufacturers, India's Expert Advisory Group on polio recommended the staggered introduction of fractional-dosing. India was the first country to introduce fractional-dose inactivated poliovirus vaccine into routine immunization, initially in eight states in 2016. Following a rapid assessment of its initial implementation, fractional-dosing was extended and, by June 2017, all Indian states were covered. Here we summarize India's experience with the introduction, discuss the challenges faced and the strategies used to address them, and report on the outcomes achieved. We also describe the lessons learnt, especially managing vaccine supplies and wastage, monitoring and supervision, and training needs. As the use of fractional-dose inactivated poliovirus vaccine is dose-sparing and reduces the cost of the immunization programme, it will remain an important part of India's long-term strategy for polio vaccination.

En 2016, l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé (OMS) a annoncé une pénurie mondiale du vaccin antipoliomyélitique inactivé, prévue pour durer jusqu'à 2020 au minimum. Face à cette situation, le Groupe stratégique consultatif d'experts sur la vaccination a recommandé aux pays d'envisager un changement de stratégie afin de privilégier l'utilisation du vaccin antipoliomyélitique inactivé en doses fractionnées, ce qui implique un nouveau calendrier de vaccination (administration du vaccin à l'âge de 6 et de 14 semaines) et un mode d'administration différent de celui du vaccin antipoliomyélitique inactivé en dose complète (par voie intradermique et non pas par voie intramusculaire). L'introduction d'une vaccination en doses fractionnées exige de la rigueur en matière de planification et de gestion, afin de garantir des stocks de vaccins suffisants, d'éviter les gaspillages, de former les agents de santé et d'assurer une tenue précise des dossiers médicaux. Début 2016, du fait de la pénurie mondiale du vaccin et d'un approvisionnement limité par les fabricants nationaux, le Groupe consultatif d'experts de l'Inde sur l'éradication de la poliomyélite a recommandé d'introduire progressivement les doses fractionnées. Si bien que l'Inde est le premier pays à avoir introduit le vaccin antipoliomyélitique inactivé en doses fractionnées dans le calendrier de vaccination systématique, d'abord dans huit États en 2016. Après une rapide évaluation de cette mise en œuvre initiale, l'utilisation des doses fractionnées s'est étendue, pour finalement être effective dans tous les États indiens en juin 2017. Dans cet article, nous récapitulons l'expérience de l'Inde à ce sujet, nous évoquons les défis rencontrés et les stratégies employées pour les surmonter ainsi que les résultats obtenus. Nous décrivons également les enseignements tirés de cette expérience, notamment en matière de gestion des stocks de vaccins, de prévention des gaspillages, de suivi et de supervision, mais aussi concernant les besoins en formation. Étant donné que l'utilisation de doses fractionnées du vaccin antipoliomyélitique inactivé permet d'économiser des doses vaccinales et de réduire le coût du programme de vaccination, cela restera un élément essentiel dans la stratégie à long terme de l'Inde en matière de vaccination contre la poliomyélite.

En 2016, la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) anunció una escasez mundial de vacunas inactivadas del poliovirus que se esperaba que se prolongara al menos hasta 2020. En respuesta, el Grupo de asesoramiento estratégico de expertos en inmunización de la OMS recomendó que los países consideraran la posibilidad de un cambio estratégico hacia una vacuna inactivada del poliovirus de dosis fraccionada, que incluye un nuevo esquema de dosificación (es decir, administrada a las seis y a las catorce semanas de edad) y que tiene un modo de administración diferente al de la vacuna inactivada del poliovirus de dosis completa (es decir, intradérmica y no intramuscular). La introducción de la dosis fraccionada requiere una planificación y una gestión minuciosas para garantizar el suministro adecuado de las vacunas, evitar el despilfarro, formar a los trabajadores sanitarios y garantizar el mantenimiento de registros precisos. A principios de 2016, dada la escasez mundial de vacunas y el limitado suministro de los fabricantes nacionales, el Grupo de asesoramiento experto sobre la polio de la India recomendó la introducción escalonada de dosis fraccionadas. La India fue el primer país en introducir la vacuna inactivada del poliovirus de dosis fraccionada en la inmunización sistemática, inicialmente en ocho estados en 2016. Tras una rápida evaluación de la aplicación inicial, se amplió la dosificación fraccionada y, para junio de 2017, se cubrieron todos los estados de la India. En este documento se resume la experiencia de la India con la introducción, se examinan los problemas encontrados y las estrategias utilizadas para resolverlos y se informa sobre los resultados alcanzados. También se describen las lecciones aprendidas, especialmente en lo que se refiere a la gestión de los suministros de vacunas y el desperdicio, el seguimiento y la supervisión, y las necesidades de formación. Dado que el uso de la vacuna inactivada del poliovirus de dosis fraccionada ahorra dosis y reduce el coste del programa de inmunización, seguirá siendo una parte importante de la estrategia a largo plazo de la India para la vacunación contra la polio.

Clinical study of safety and immunogenicity of pentavalent DTP-HB-Hib vaccine administered by disposable-syringe jet injector in India.

INTRODUCTION: We conducted a randomized, observer-blind, non-inferiority, parallel-group clinical study of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, and Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate (pentavalent) vaccination of infants in India. Goals were to determine whether the seropositivity rate after vaccination via disposable-syringe jet injector (DSJI) was non-inferior to that via needle and syringe (N-S), and to compare the safety of vaccination by the two methods. METHODS: Healthy children received a three-dose series of vaccine intramuscularly by DSJI or N-S beginning at 6-8 weeks of age. Immunoglobulin G antibody levels were measured by ELISA at 4-6 weeks after the third dose. The main secondary endpoint was safety, measured as injection site and systemic reactions. DISCUSSION: The study was stopped early out of caution beyond that specified in the protocol stopping criteria, after the Data Safety Committee noted a higher frequency of injection site reactions, especially moderate and severe, in the DSJI group. As a result, 128 subjects-DSJI group 61; N-S group 67-completed the study, rather than the 340 planned, and the study was not sufficiently powered to compare immunogenicity endpoints for the groups. Descriptive statistics indicate that seropositivity induced by vaccination with the DSJI was similar to that of N-S for all five antigens. Pentavalent vaccine includes whole-cell pertussis vaccine and an aluminum adjuvant, which may have contributed to the higher number of local reactions with the DSJI. The reactions caused no serious or long-term sequelae, and may be more acceptable in other populations or circumstances.US National Institutes of Health clinical trials identifier: NCT02409095.

Immunogenicity and safety of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine delivered by disposable-syringe jet injector in India: A randomized, parallel group, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a randomized, non-inferiority, clinical study of MMR vaccine by a disposable-syringe jet injector (DSJI) in toddlers in India in comparison with the conventional administration. METHODS: MMR vaccine was administered subcutaneously by DSJI or needle-syringe (N-S) to toddlers (15-18 months) who had received a measles vaccine at 9 months. Seropositivity to measles, mumps, and rubella serum IgG antibodies was assessed 35 days after vaccination. Non-inferiority was concluded if the upper limit of the 95% CI for the difference in the percent of seropositive between groups was less than 10%. Solicited reactions were collected for 14 days after vaccination by using structured diaries. RESULTS: In each study group, 170 subjects received MMR vaccine. On day 35, seropositivity for measles was 97.5% [95% CI (93.8%, 99.3%)] in the DSJI group and 98.7% [95% CI (95.5%, 99.8%)] in the N-S group; for mumps, 98.8% [95% CI (95.6%, 99.8%)] and 98.7% [95% CI (95.5%, 99.8%)]; and for rubella, 98.8% [95% CI (95.6%, 99.8%)] and 100% [95% CI (97.7%, 100.0%)]; none of the differences were significant. The day 35 post-vaccination GMTs in DSJI and N-S groups were measles: 5.48 IU/ml [95% CI (3.71, 8.11)] and 5.94 IU/ml [95% CI (3.92, 9.01)], mumps: 3.83 ISR [95% CI (3.53, 4.14)] and 3.66 ISR [95% CI (3.39, 3.95)] and rubella: 95.27 IU/ml [95% CI (70.39, 128.95)] and 107.06 IU/ml [95% CI (79.02, 145.06)]; none of the differences were significant. The DSJI group reported 173 solicited local reactions and the N-S group reported 112; most were mild grade. Of the total of 156 solicited systemic adverse events, most were mild, and incidence between the two groups was similar. CONCLUSIONS: MMR vaccination via DSJI is as immunogenic as vaccination by N-S. Safety profile of DSJI method is similar to N-S except for injection site reactions which are more with DSJI and are well-tolerated. Registration US National Institutes of Health clinical trials identifier - NCT02253407. Clinical trial registry of India identifier - CTRI/2013/05/003702.

A novel device for collecting and dispensing fingerstick blood for point of care testing.

The increased world-wide availability of point-of-care (POC) tests utilizing fingerstick blood has led to testing scenarios in which multiple separate fingersticks are performed during a single patient encounter, generating cumulative discomfort and reducing testing efficiency. We have developed a device capable of a) collection of up to 100 µL of fingerstick blood from a single fingerstick by capillary action, and b) dispensing this blood in variable increments set by the user. We tested the prototype device both in a controlled laboratory setting and in a fingerstick study involving naive device users, and found it to have accuracy and precision similar to a conventional pipettor. The users also found the device to be easy to use, and recommended minor ergonomic improvements. Our device would allow performance of multiple POC tests from a single fingerstick blood sample, thus providing a novel functionality that may be of use in many testing settings worldwide.

Suitability of capillary blood for quantitative assessment of G6PD activity and performances of G6PD point-of-care tests.

The use of primaquine and other 8-aminoquinolines for malaria elimination is hampered by, among other factors, the limited availability of point-of-care tests for the diagnosis of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. Historically, the most used source of blood for G6PD analyses is venous blood, whereas diagnostic devices used in the field require the use of capillary blood; data have shown that the two sources of blood often differ with respect to hemoglobin concentration and number of red blood cells. Therefore, we have analyzed, in both capillary and venous blood drawn from the same healthy donors, the correlation of G6PD activity assessed by two qualitative tests (the Fluorescent Spot test and the CareStart test) with the gold standard quantitative spectrophotometric assay. Results obtained on 150 subjects with normal, intermediate, and deficient G6PD phenotypes show that, although differences exist between the aforementioned characteristics in capillary and venous blood, these do not impact on the quantitative assessment of G6PD activity after corrected for hemoglobin concentration or red blood cell count. Furthermore, we have assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the two qualitative tests against the gold standard spectrophotometric assay at different activity thresholds of residual enzymatic activity in both blood sources.

Comparison of quantitative and qualitative tests for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency.

A barrier to eliminating Plasmodium vivax malaria is inadequate treatment of infected patients. 8-Aminoquinoline-based drugs clear the parasite; however, people with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency are at risk for hemolysis from these drugs. Understanding the performance of G6PD deficiency tests is critical for patient safety. Two quantitative assays and two qualitative tests were evaluated. The comparison of quantitative assays gave a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.7585 with significant difference in mean G6PD activity, highlighting the need to adhere to a single reference assay. Both qualitative tests had high sensitivity and negative predictive value at a cutoff G6PD value of 40% of normal activity if interpreted conservatively and performed under laboratory conditions. The performance of both tests dropped at a cutoff level of 45%. Cytochemical staining of specimens confirmed that heterozygous females with > 50% G6PD-deficient cells can seem normal by phenotypic tests.

The essential role of infection-detection technologies for malaria elimination and eradication.

Recent emphasis on malaria elimination and eradication (E&E) goals is changing the way that experts evaluate malaria diagnostic tools and tactics. As prevalence declines, the focus of malaria management is pivoting toward low-density, subclinical infections and geographically and demographically concentrated reservoirs. These and other changes present challenges and opportunities for innovations in malaria diagnostics aimed at meeting the needs of malaria elimination programs. Developing such technologies requires a review of the operational approaches to detecting malaria infections in areas of declining prevalence. Here we review recent research on epidemiology and biology related to malaria elimination and operational factors that influence E&E strategies. We further propose use-scenarios and a target product profile framework to define and prioritize the required attributes of infection-detection technologies.

G6PD testing in support of treatment and elimination of malaria: recommendations for evaluation of G6PD tests.

Malaria elimination will be possible only with serious attempts to address asymptomatic infection and chronic infection by both Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax. Currently available drugs that can completely clear a human of P. vivax (known as "radical cure"), and that can reduce transmission of malaria parasites, are those in the 8-aminoquinoline drug family, such as primaquine. Unfortunately, people with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency risk having severe adverse reactions if exposed to these drugs at certain doses. G6PD deficiency is the most common human enzyme defect, affecting approximately 400 million people worldwide.Scaling up radical cure regimens will require testing for G6PD deficiency, at two levels: 1) the individual level to ensure safe case management, and 2) the population level to understand the risk in the local population to guide Plasmodium vivax treatment policy. Several technical and operational knowledge gaps must be addressed to expand access to G6PD deficiency testing and to ensure that a patient's G6PD status is known before deciding to administer an 8-aminoquinoline-based drug.In this report from a stakeholder meeting held in Thailand on October 4 and 5, 2012, G6PD testing in support of radical cure is discussed in detail. The focus is on challenges to the development and evaluation of G6PD diagnostic tests, and on challenges related to the operational aspects of implementing G6PD testing in support of radical cure. The report also describes recommendations for evaluation of diagnostic tests for G6PD deficiency in support of radical cure.

Field evaluation of a prototype paper-based point-of-care fingerstick transaminase test.

Monitoring for drug-induced liver injury (DILI) via serial transaminase measurements in patients on potentially hepatotoxic medications (e.g., for HIV and tuberculosis) is routine in resource-rich nations, but often unavailable in resource-limited settings. Towards enabling universal access to affordable point-of-care (POC) screening for DILI, we have performed the first field evaluation of a paper-based, microfluidic fingerstick test for rapid, semi-quantitative, visual measurement of blood alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Our objectives were to assess operational feasibility, inter-operator variability, lot variability, device failure rate, and accuracy, to inform device modification for further field testing. The paper-based ALT test was performed at POC on fingerstick samples from 600 outpatients receiving HIV treatment in Vietnam. Results, read independently by two clinic nurses, were compared with gold-standard automated (Roche Cobas) results from venipuncture samples obtained in parallel. Two device lots were used sequentially. We demonstrated high inter-operator agreement, with 96.3% (95% C.I., 94.3-97.7%) agreement in placing visual results into clinically-defined "bins" (<3x, 3-5x, and >5x upper limit of normal), >90% agreement in validity determination, and intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.89 (95% C.I., 0.87-0.91). Lot variability was observed in % invalids due to hemolysis (21.1% for Lot 1, 1.6% for Lot 2) and correlated with lots of incorporated plasma separation membranes. Invalid rates <1% were observed for all other device controls. Overall bin placement accuracy for the two readers was 84% (84.3%/83.6%). Our findings of extremely high inter-operator agreement for visual reading-obtained in a target clinical environment, as performed by local practitioners-indicate that the device operation and reading process is feasible and reproducible. Bin placement accuracy and lot-to-lot variability data identified specific targets for device optimization and material quality control. This is the first field study performed with a patterned paper-based microfluidic device and opens the door to development of similar assays for other important analytes.

Cryopreservation of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity inside red blood cells: developing a specimen repository in support of development and evaluation of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency tests.

BACKGROUND: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is a common human enzyme deficiency. It is characterized by abnormally low levels of G6PD activity. Individuals with G6PD deficiency are at risk of undergoing acute haemolysis when exposed to 8‒aminoquinoline-based drugs, such as primaquine. For this reason it is imperative to identify individuals with G6PD deficiency prior to administering these anti-malarial drugs. There is a need for the development and evaluation of point-of-care G6PD deficiency screening tests suitable for areas of the developing world where malarial treatments are frequently administered. The development and evaluation of new G6PD tests will be greatly assisted with the availability of specimen repositories. METHODS: Cryopreservation of erythrocytes was evaluated as a means to preserve G6PD activity. Blood specimens from 31 patients including ten specimens with normal G6PD activity, three with intermediate activity, and 18 with deficient activity were cryopreserved for up to six months. RESULTS: Good correlation in G6PD activity between fresh and cryopreserved specimens (R2 = 0.95). The cryopreserved specimens show an overall small drop in mean G6PD activity of 0.23 U/g Hb (P=0.23). Cytochemical staining showed that intracellular G6PD activity distribution within the red blood cell populations is preserved during cryopreservation. Furthermore, the mosaic composition of red blood cells in heterozygous women is also preserved for six months or more. The fluorescent spot and the BinaxNOW qualitative tests for G6PD deficiency also showed high concordance in G6PD status determination between cryopreserved specimens and fresh specimens. CONCLUSIONS: A methodology for establishing a specimen panel for evaluation of G6PD tests is described. The approach is similar to that used in several malaria research facilities for the cryopreservation of parasites in clinical specimens and axenic cultures. Specimens stored in this manner will aid both the development and evaluation of current and emerging G6PD tests. The availability of G6PD tests is a critical bottleneck to broader access to drugs that confer radical cure of Plasmodium vivax, a requirement for elimination of malaria.